From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6E771395ACC8; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:17:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6E771395ACC8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1592911061; bh=SS6L1fYT3ybN8Qu58sqYIyDo4CGv4SSeIGQKFsHSAX4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AggdI70mLmANnkfs/sRpLjDLrAxBJgfknxArSk838O5r5+TjNOIO0hp+PVV4LrU1e URC8lOv6+BETD5SITk5LcFHbx5jo8vGD8QThV+5dyYNk/BfjmalGXIyMaXfFoTYqBA aV/ha9YXZGFE4Z5Ns3UCEISDGZ33FEtlkVtEck14= From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:17:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:17:41 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95577 Alexandre Oliva changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot g= nu.org --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva --- Iain, Do platforms that use dsymutil support -gsplit-dwarf? I'm thinking of bringing -g into the gsplit_dwarf variable, so it won't be enable without -gsplit-dwarf, and removing other explicit mentions of -g fr= om outputs.exp. Would this be enough to address the dsymutil left-overs?=