From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 05A9C3851C09; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:38:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05A9C3851C09 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/95582] [11 Regression] LTO lean + PGO bootstrap is broken in Ada Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:38:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:38:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95582 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- Same for #define VECT_SCALAR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P(TYPE) \ - (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TYPE) \ - && TYPE_PRECISION (TYPE) =3D=3D 1) + ((TREE_CODE (TYPE) =3D=3D BOOLEAN_TYPE \ + && TYPE_PRECISION (TYPE) =3D=3D 1) \ + || ((TREE_CODE (TYPE) =3D=3D INTEGER_TYPE \ + || TREE_CODE (TYPE) =3D=3D ENUMERAL_TYPE) \ + && TYPE_PRECISION (TYPE) =3D=3D 1 \ + && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TYPE))) so we do need to understand the Ada failure instead for which again I'm hop= ing for a (LTO) testcase. I'm not too familiar with the vector boolean pattern stuff so I'm not the appropriate person to dig into this. At least it seems this VECT_SCALAR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P predicate is very much fragile.=