From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1083D3851C1D; Tue,  9 Jun 2020 05:33:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1083D3851C1D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1591680788;
 bh=rzzbc2Uvy6Z3Xxs+Nzru71Ve0SqHFfuDH9Uzajy4LQ8=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=Jj5kc38rnxfo7pUbBEQ4wd3n18L6VqHJqn6PJjyAIkV1k6KO0phN4/scWCnmNWwSz
 7cuytW2X8yyvW8L/YrBXO6krmEAUL8XwIlPyk5/Zq0Gwv2odd+4P8yMr1YAXgvKWyV
 pD2gtyLEO9m/pNoJmO3prXTQe6pqpF7AdLEF4OsY=
From: "lewissbaker.opensource at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95599] [coroutines] destructor for temporary operand to
 co_yield expression called before end of full-expression
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 05:33:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lewissbaker.opensource at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95599-4-SZZR0U4AvS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 05:33:08 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95599

--- Comment #1 from Lewis Baker <lewissbaker.opensource at gmail dot com> -=
--
Note there is also some different behaviour if we change the example slight=
ly
by removing awaitable::~awaitable() and leaving the awaitable type with a
trivial destructor.

See https://godbolt.org/z/ff5Uvy

In this case, instead of the resource destructor being called before the
coroutine suspends, the resource destructor is never called.

ie. observed output becomes:
```
resource()
awaitable::await_suspend()
awaitable::await_resume()
```=