From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 37F203840C04; Tue,  9 Jun 2020 18:56:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 37F203840C04
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1591729004;
 bh=XqqglWdc1foHM5M62roh/3zU+0p9k5aDqeBAG5I0s0U=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=j1RSJoeifld72oVLekrXpwmBpANBVkVwa2ioozMWfsFw/y+rBZZ8EPdK1ZI45U7dj
 9WrcmyAypPnWa6qK5OR3+PWvdxaUvPkHWyWtCRwvh/PtfGNsiTKqJFPJhlG4d0WPOJ
 qzux9u/z0jWaTaQFOO29LvIDu7vq3xTeL89UyFBQ=
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95615] [coroutines] Coroutine frame and promise is leaked
 if exception thrown from promise.initial_suspend()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:56:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone everconfirmed
 bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-95615-4-eP79DZ20oX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95615-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95615-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:56:44 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95615

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-06-09
   Target Milestone|---                         |10.2
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
thanks for the report.

I think the get-return-object case should now be handled (once the patch to=
 add
the cleanup is approved), since that can be covered by a conventional clean=
up
expression.

Will need to look at the best way to handle the other two.=