From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 96FAC3840C21; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:21:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 96FAC3840C21
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1591773710;
 bh=k/EuSDtamoV3uDPMh9EGqD49wDkMb46JWDKU8txXB94=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=sjp+69qxoJVWQ6w3zcRU3IO5X+1QBNbQpbcvbgcLGfsiVnLsw+Q941rkCjSlESAGi
 6FKv7Gaa0DAnSCY+QYv0zbQqQo8jLZ+cK/IUNBZVx/Bi9amZdUMEnqU6wEYDlpGr/H
 fr5OZkP8kkjY1iLlAGNNKZmvbo+3O2S6sBzIPAiY=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/95620] [10/11 Regression] relocation truncated to fit:
 R_X86_64_PC32 against `.bss'
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:21:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on resolution
 everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-95620-4-T5DRWDgQoo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95620-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95620-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:21:50 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95620

Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-06-10
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So it's really problem as with LTO we don't put the large array into .lbss
section:

LTO:
        .file   "<artificial>"
        .text
        .local  a
        .comm   a,2830270464,32
        .local  b
        .comm   b,4,4

non-LTO mode:

        .globl  a
        .section        .lbss,"aw"
        .align 32
        .type   a, @object
        .size   a, 2830270464
a:
        .zero   2830270464

So the symbol goes from .lbss section to .data section as LTO makes the sym=
bol
local.=