From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B9A5C386196C; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:56:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B9A5C386196C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1594796180; bh=QI3WTT97v9UHmirZC+HeFb0EyV0JceHovHLtCYLToC0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rcK9hJU5VIcGDop7qJDJaEQMKUsdqT/ZD7fHhvMfJfDThMEPOaqNQBdqdwKlt6iF7 cHxK8h45tMBQIsLa5a44+pIEy2B4VD7wlPWiu5Mc4rBtET+RfVeDFVVll96mK4s3+u fdBYlJYBtKVo5SADr8Eo2rEJiw4VX+1c47dZULFo= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/95622] [11 Regression] force_output flag on a variable prevents optimization / regresses c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta{-2,-4,}.c Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:56:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, openacc, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: version target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:56:20 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95622 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10.0 |11.0 Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- not sure if fixed?=