From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B8E8E383E817; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 10:40:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8E8E383E817
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1593340829;
 bh=qQ9leYojq7z2hpOCJ9yXANiqGymqdkrk3vPRtMlmVFQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=UEeNcPd7QIL1wtyZ1o916C0hFTn++8qmXutqdADSP/IjwyMlnc1wqkjonWlm6/zan
 XLs7BiFZvzvQR6f+ZzbHzvSDNlDwGc7skmKi33cdKk7kiL59clu/xlrEvqnglkvjJR
 KHd6FKAtCbnluMXjfoYz2IAcXK+gyoKokHsYnLPk=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/95637] Read-only data assigned to `.sdata' rather than
 `.rodata'
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 10:40:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-95637-4-NzAIcwOO3h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95637-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95637-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 10:40:29 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95637

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-06-28

--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Regardless, I think run-time enforcement of the immutability of constant
> data is important for some use cases and possibly even required by some
> programming languages (Ada?).

No, not in Ada, and I don't really see how this could be done as languages =
are
usually specified in terms of an abstract machine; it's pure ABI stuff.=