From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CC66A388700D; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:05:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CC66A388700D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1592143551; bh=G0GIgJn2Qqfm9SLmFqcVz3U5r8YLhugBF3mQfdUyFW8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cd+iag8uU69PXPI+aBpKaIKld8N1MGsdmPikM+0YcgFXD3PLWMefpbno0b5ivVGEm QktkL+mYQuYJwUGH7dRBFH+iq5so37FEnGs3vimnperALsXbYUT89iNaW/4vpcweRX FCtMJwEAzGrqgj7t6Dy1hSjlzvzcVy7JEIKSW1P8= From: "seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3 Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:05:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:05:51 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95649 Bill Seurer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |seurer at linux dot vnet.i= bm.com --- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer --- I am seeing something slightly different that started with the same revisio= n on powerpc64 as well. It is preventing several of the spec2006 tests from compiling. See pr95662.=