From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CE02A386F024; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:11:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CE02A386F024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1600290718; bh=I78Sqhz1AOCjU9EguheyYYnK3FVMNuR24bYb9xEwQbo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EsfSXQIi2HrJy9BLmTUy8OKyOTOxurocE28HYbI1rLSrjPGLlhW0vfatLNFYxiY+o 6YJv9b9pTIx93bD916ZzfiSoX/g/vMN48LOzJ/16MStRqHBHzzhLEJKjB+juUOg9x+ X1ujx/h8fJZKDxspKcRpHuTYDa3LzXth4TNw7ANw= From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95654] nvptx offloading: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr66199-5.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:11:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:11:58 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95654 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2020-09-16 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus --- See also thread at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/thread.html#5540= 54 Mentioned there RELATED PR: PR 80053 =E2=80=93 similar issue related to label with address taken=