From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B68AE3870865; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:01:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B68AE3870865
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592064093;
 bh=9fecFLYUtVV16fyeb3y60W2Q3NlvoqwCQhZKI111EYA=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=JppvJ0uChvVhiDquTryl+PB6/pysS9tKNAItKQWQJD/EDPsgNx8A60pQkIHWPHq1B
 c80uNLyEjFsGkn/smfjuu5lkoKvvCkLUQMQJ6mCoCme/d7zpYojVbSmtzftsWaLo1E
 s7cNzMpgb3latIrtsTMPpSBoCLvubT89BHLpLujc=
From: "ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/95664] generic instantiation fails to detect abstract
 equality, builds with gcc-9 and fails to link with gcc-10
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:01:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-95664-4-XUXPmx0ECr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95664-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95664-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:01:33 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95664

Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org

--- Comment #1 from Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> ---
ARM 3.9.3(3/2): A subprogram declared by an abstract_subprogram_declaration
or a formal_abstract_subprogram_declaration is an abstract subprogram.
If it is a primitive subprogram of a tagged type, then the tagged type
shall be abstract.

so this does not explicitly forbid abstract subprograms that are primitive
to an untagged type; however:

7
A call on an abstract subprogram shall be a dispatching call;
nondispatching calls to an abstract subprogram are not allowed.

this implicitly requires the formal type of the controlling operand to be
tagged and the actual to be class-wide.

Therefore I think gcc-9.3 and gcc-10.1 should both report an error; it shou=
ld
be illegal to declare "=3D" as an abstract primitive subprogram of the unta=
gged
type Element.=