From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 3F4C23851C2B; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:36:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3F4C23851C2B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592210183;
 bh=EmBqHp4i/zZEWqZcQsG+/+lx5n2fiKqEg9qpTdj4WgY=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=x58S7vXyfWoOzjCDtimq+XH3WksG0Vvaz5AGjSDZqzTpaQ+FBrtcoox1RPBCX0GHP
 DLMDN3cMnWCW2xGtO/nGDQBP5JpgyejACf4RH7aXrWI2o4XBmyc02eCEJGGM0zg2zZ
 ehDx3fu8uvAblFLaLIxQeeawnTg4urLkGJhI5gAU=
From: "sujian.liu at huawei dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95677] undefined reference to `(anonymous namespace)::xx'
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:36:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sujian.liu at huawei dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95677-4-SUcSlFGgkD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:36:23 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95677

--- Comment #2 from liusujian <sujian.liu at huawei dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> It's more likely the GENERIC / cgraph output by the C++ frontend is not
> correct
> and works by accident without LTO.  Initial symbol table:
>=20
> Initial Symbol table:
>=20
> int {anonymous}::xx/3 (int {anonymous}::xx) @0x7f615d2d8180
>   Type: variable
>   Visibility: external
>   References:
>   Referring: _ZN12_GLOBAL__N_13fooEv/0 (write)
>   Availability: not-ready
>   Varpool flags:
> main/2 (int main()) @0x7f615d421168
>   Type: function definition analyzed
>   Visibility: force_output no_reorder public
>   Aux: @0x37a5000
>   References: int {anonymous}::xx/1 (write)
>   Referring:
>   Function flags: body
>   Called by:
>   Calls:
> int {anonymous}::xx/1 (int {anonymous}::xx) @0x7f615d2d8100
>   Type: variable definition analyzed
>   Visibility: force_output no_reorder
>   Aux: @0x7f615d421168
>   References:
>   Referring: main/2 (write)
>   Availability: not-ready
>   Varpool flags: initialized
> _ZN12_GLOBAL__N_13fooEv/0 (void {anonymous}::foo()) @0x7f615d421000
>   Type: function definition analyzed
>   Visibility: force_output no_reorder
>   Aux: @0x7f615d2d8100
>   References: int {anonymous}::xx/3 (write)
>   Referring:
>   Function flags: body
>   Called by:
>   Calls:
>=20
> where you can see there are actually two 'xx' objects and the C++ FE
> takes it up to the linker/assembler to resolve them.  But the symtab
> code does not include such "resolving" step.


In other words, C++ is currently unable to deal with this scenario ? Or any
other problems cause the error?=