From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 304CD385EC54; Sun, 30 May 2021 22:25:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 304CD385EC54
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/95714] Poor locations for errors in calls to __atomic built-ins
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 22:25:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on
 everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-95714-4-lkthX2Pbrn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 22:25:41 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95714

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-05-30
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
C++ front-end does a little better than the C front-end now:
apinski@xeond:~/src/upstream-gcc$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/gcc t887.c
t887.c: In function =E2=80=98main=E2=80=99:
t887.c:5:3: error: size mismatch in argument 2 of =E2=80=98__atomic_load=E2=
=80=99
    5 |   __atomic_load(&c, &i, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
apinski@xeond:~/src/upstream-gcc$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/g++ t887.c
t887.c: In function =E2=80=98int main()=E2=80=99:
t887.c:5:16: error: size mismatch in argument 2 of =E2=80=98__atomic_load=
=E2=80=99
    5 |   __atomic_load(&c, &i, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Confirmed.=