From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8F676395C036; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:46:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8F676395C036 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1592498769; bh=VqYUyXrNErE7acobQ7ab2PQN7HFkZdRXkVfAIlN+0iA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ftw599oOI38OHgZlAW5SmmYH3rwJmP0F63duUayO/JRE+hCMklUXOmOCgiyAIcpvt UKYLBfffegNOqJ6RFZQjfYESQQV/WG/dxE9bRn6bWyimlkrwRIjYy4rZVX3qjUOn1U cYi8kzlvZsjkywqTTizB7DvXN1tfp0V0QtgnpRJo= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/95726] ICE with aarch64 __Float32x4_t as template argument Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:46:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:46:09 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95726 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Dunno, perhaps for backporting it could be done in template_args_equal inst= ead? Like I said, it would probably need to handle also POINTER/REFERENCE/ARRAY_= TYPE whose ultimate element type is VECTOR_TYPE possibly affected by this. Dunno about aggregates, I'd hope we set TYPE_CANONICAL for most of them and therefore shouldn't care about this. If comptypes returns false for these, can one still implicitly convert them= to the other vector types? Does 32-bit ARM have similar types too? Anyway, your questions are more for Jason...=