From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 719FC3892459; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:04:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 719FC3892459 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1595603070; bh=fhKVKuu7Os6CF8++QTKQ+3jCwNk6UM356k98gaSH7dI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Vz94LWrxchEzu+cAHIkbEKtP/NwHmHiB3IrlxfHN/occKHS+hTJK1j/Y0wH3h3llX eJ+d1CRIJ7328UOTmD7k/ppsz/HS2r9oZ6L6puUCDcfFIzxWpKwSoL1mUhodTd+nLK ep+XMvgr0kmZcSjQ0eCIw23Le05QehOV1p3VOOV0= From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95730] GCN offloading ICEs after commit fe7ebef7fe4f9acb79658ed9db0749b07efc3105 "Add support for __builtin_bswap128" Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:04:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ams at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:04:30 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95730 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > Therefore int128_t does not exist, as far as users are concerned. I'm not > sure how that translates to the GCC internals, but trying to use TImode f= or > anything other than moves is not going to work on GCN. Yes, the code precisely makes sure it is not used in this case, but it looks like something causes it to be nevertheless streamed.=