From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4E06F396EC24; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:19:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E06F396EC24 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1592471954; bh=t55bVnPvj/ipFqwYvetFBU41QmeytpejUwQodubcOqY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mXpoW0SnC+9b71/MOyk9KPs3PmIN/d4kZ08bxtCen+yi324NNJhP8d3txlxKLbWaR Gv1G0lPBU8q7UyuM1ylWl1rwz5Vz62O+dJQV5aGNygG/sa3sj6gIGrQKsdlXIJ+ByF MHoI6IAzPYbqzNQr4+X26qsrgsWKWDqtC6AZsFEM= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/95731] Faiilure to optimize a >= 0 && b >= 0 to (a | b) >= 0 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:19:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easyhack, missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:19:14 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95731 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or reassoc could do it across different BBs.=