From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A35A83851C20; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:40:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A35A83851C20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592584819;
 bh=8M3b4jMsfNXxkmReG7dqpw1I5jINd/8Zyj0IV49Xpnc=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=v1h1R7JoQ6Owq0YU0xxaR30AcTJg3gYzMQm0cE/ZSRkxB3X3lRflvwgbrPv1/xcuU
 nb/MdeOhsYM/GM0PnXGCFW68BEv+/r4v7Dj0VJSQ/hoB89LbKsT1UBlwVBN/QAte0T
 CP+pM7s2jK4F/4K5XP/HQUfBM5UZpKUPRroHoL4c=
From: "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/95737] PPC: Unnecessary extsw after negative less than
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:40:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95737-4-zYzrxWhXHv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95737-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95737-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:40:19 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95737

--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please test this out of context of a return statement.  The problem with
unnecessary extends of return values is widely known and not specific to th=
is
particular case.=