From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 10B3F386188D; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:50:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 10B3F386188D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1593525025;
 bh=s6r6vWQ6qeOTT9gWAzxPSDRh5+T4tGCqTElYvuBMf98=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ivgOuEw4+/UXwM6X98y0tc0b+IjImHJ0Z32ISAM9qPyt6NUw5mVkqqUBlz9EBDOCN
 vYfsLShtRV+rkEiN2Da5GHCB+gqe0d7QUlL8eiNQmZnP7cRwYAWXpytKRB3RtUL/sQ
 Gd+4DBQwiCOuQuNLxwGseAC/sghmGW+5kt5G08hc=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to
 nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:50:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95743-4-NU7yJUWxkU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95743-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95743-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:50:25 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95743

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas K=C3=A0=C2=A4=C2=A5=C3=
=A0=C2=A4nig
<tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc0a56856417a91dc49fd1ea75e0802d0f5da276

commit r9-8707-gdc0a56856417a91dc49fd1ea75e0802d0f5da276
Author: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
Date:   Mon Jun 29 23:11:06 2020 +0200

    Do not generate recursion check for compiler-generated procedures.

    This one-line fix removes a check for recursion for procedures
    which are compiler-generated, such as finalizers or deallocation.
    These need to be recursive, even if the user code should not be.

    gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

            PR fortran/95743
            * trans-decl.c (gfc_generate_function_code): Do not generate
            recursion check for compiler-generated procedures.

    (cherry picked from commit 95cdcf701dad826f225d6413b59650f181954399)=