public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
@ 2020-06-18 13:54 antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
2020-06-19 7:11 ` [Bug fortran/95743] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr @ 2020-06-18 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
Bug ID: 95743
Summary: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive
procedure with -fcheck=recursion
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
Target Milestone: ---
I was able to reproduce the closed bug #80361 with gfortran 9.3.0 and 10.1.0
using the following code:
program test_recursive_call
implicit none
type t_tree_node
type(t_tree_node), dimension(:), allocatable :: child
end type
type t_tree
type(t_tree_node), allocatable :: root
end type
type(t_tree), allocatable :: tree
allocate(tree)
allocate(tree%root)
allocate(tree%root%child(1))
! If the line below is removed, the code works fine.
allocate(tree%root%child(1)%child(1))
deallocate(tree)
end program
Command line to compile the code:
gfortran -g -fcheck=recursion -o tree tree.f90
I obtain the following runtime error:
At line 1 of file tree.f90
Fortran runtime error: Recursive call to nonrecursive procedure
'__deallocate_test_recursive_call_T_tree_node'
Error termination. Backtrace:
#0 0x5623824511fb in __deallocate_test_recursive_call_T_tree_node
at /home/****/fortran/test_gcc_ice2/tree.f90:1
#1 0x562382451302 in __deallocate_test_recursive_call_T_tree_node
at /home/****/fortran/test_gcc_ice2/tree.f90:1
#2 0x562382451b95 in test_recursive_call
at /home/****/fortran/test_gcc_ice2/tree.f90:18
#3 0x562382452230 in main
at /home/****/fortran/test_gcc_ice2/tree.f90:19
It works fine without -fcheck=recursion.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
2020-06-18 13:54 [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
@ 2020-06-19 7:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-28 12:44 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-19 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Priority|P3 |P4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
2020-06-18 13:54 [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
2020-06-19 7:11 ` [Bug fortran/95743] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-28 12:44 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-29 20:35 ` [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-28 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2020-06-28
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
2020-06-18 13:54 [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
2020-06-19 7:11 ` [Bug fortran/95743] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-28 12:44 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-29 20:35 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-29 21:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-29 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[9/10 Regression] bogus |[9/10/11 Regression] bogus
|recursive call to |recursive call to
|nonrecursive procedure with |nonrecursive procedure with
|-fcheck=recursion |-fcheck=recursion
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Also fails on current master.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
2020-06-18 13:54 [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-29 20:35 ` [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-29 21:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 13:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-29 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95cdcf701dad826f225d6413b59650f181954399
commit r11-1719-g95cdcf701dad826f225d6413b59650f181954399
Author: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Mon Jun 29 23:11:06 2020 +0200
Do not generate recursion check for compiler-generated procedures.
This one-line fix removes a check for recursion for procedures
which are compiler-generated, such as finalizers or deallocation.
These need to be recursive, even if the user code should not be.
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/95743
* trans-decl.c (gfc_generate_function_code): Do not generate
recursion check for compiler-generated procedures.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
2020-06-18 13:54 [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-29 21:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-30 13:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 13:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 13:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-30 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
<tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e1d5e760513bf47931f99d0e5b277a5afcdb6d1
commit r10-8396-g6e1d5e760513bf47931f99d0e5b277a5afcdb6d1
Author: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Mon Jun 29 23:11:06 2020 +0200
Do not generate recursion check for compiler-generated procedures.
This one-line fix removes a check for recursion for procedures
which are compiler-generated, such as finalizers or deallocation.
These need to be recursive, even if the user code should not be.
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/95743
* trans-decl.c (gfc_generate_function_code): Do not generate
recursion check for compiler-generated procedures.
(cherry picked from commit 95cdcf701dad826f225d6413b59650f181954399)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
2020-06-18 13:54 [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-30 13:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-30 13:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 13:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-30 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
<tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc0a56856417a91dc49fd1ea75e0802d0f5da276
commit r9-8707-gdc0a56856417a91dc49fd1ea75e0802d0f5da276
Author: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Mon Jun 29 23:11:06 2020 +0200
Do not generate recursion check for compiler-generated procedures.
This one-line fix removes a check for recursion for procedures
which are compiler-generated, such as finalizers or deallocation.
These need to be recursive, even if the user code should not be.
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/95743
* trans-decl.c (gfc_generate_function_code): Do not generate
recursion check for compiler-generated procedures.
(cherry picked from commit 95cdcf701dad826f225d6413b59650f181954399)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion
2020-06-18 13:54 [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-30 13:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-30 13:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-30 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on all affected branches.
Thanks for the bug report!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-30 13:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-18 13:54 [Bug fortran/95743] New: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-inp.fr
2020-06-19 7:11 ` [Bug fortran/95743] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-28 12:44 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-29 20:35 ` [Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-29 21:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 13:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 13:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 13:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).