From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B25473858D38; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 06:58:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B25473858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711436310; bh=DaK8BFb/LW0r2ICmapSet9ifgAKd33gZFT90m9FRFYs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BsPmJMDmX6vYPPrRTGWORC2N9sOW4F2l3TXA5G0hbuqapRThlsuQbfBqbRS7owhrk D3ZqYCm5upVIenmdENJ64w9BvZBmvS4yCDaVwEZBEpINWRY0WEH7WhRpww6BrqJ89g g6Iz3IWoPdS6w/RCXMDB5QpV9tR642oCZ8UUGItE= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95782] [s390] ICE in _cpp_pop_context Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 06:58:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_gcctarget target_milestone bug_status cf_known_to_work cf_reconfirmed_on short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95782 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target|powerpc64le |s390 Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|13.1.0 | Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-26 Summary|[ppc64le] ICE in |[s390] ICE in |_cpp_pop_context |_cpp_pop_context --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The powerpc issue was fixed in GCC 13 (most likely by r13-220-g067fe66c8ba9b16feacf66fce9ae668091e42821 ). s390 most likely needs the same treatment: ``` [apinski@xeond2 rs6000]$ git diff ../s390/s390-c.cc diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390-c.cc b/gcc/config/s390/s390-c.cc index 8d3d1a467a8..8096b1ff7c1 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390-c.cc +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390-c.cc @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ s390_macro_to_expand (cpp_reader *pfile, const cpp_token *tok) /* __vector long __bool a; */ if (ident =3D=3D C_CPP_HASHNODE (__bool_keyword)) expand_bool_p =3D true; - else + else if (ident) { /* Triggered with: __vector long long __bool a; */ do ``` I cannot test this at all, and a similar testcase in PR 101168 should be ad= ded for s390.=