From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1BDCC38708F9; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:28:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1BDCC38708F9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592670519;
 bh=ABpyn3FHO8YqatSI9LH2KoIBA1+m/HLTmsVB3/ihMZQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=O09VslNyJzvhXyp0GdkmuA/UBqLvuQ6AXwsHnYHef/2nzvZ2ZaiFuyLCPeXWzll06
 ktSN/sd8NgrUj4cLcos4Th6a6zWIxM7qQi4n+UFkc4zJdK4A42esBCq9WfAU2/113Q
 ZMm64X76wW8YldwciW3g0iXOO9L88MMr8QBqW/IQ=
From: "yyc1992 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/95786] New: Too aggressive target indirection
 elimination
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:28:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yyc1992 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-95786-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:28:39 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95786

            Bug ID: 95786
           Summary: Too aggressive target indirection elimination
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: yyc1992 at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

I realize this issue when debugging PR95778 and PR95780 (ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548631.html)

It seems that the indirection elimination logic does not take into account =
the
linkage and visibility of the callee and will eliminate the indirection eve=
n in
cases where a function without target attribute would have use a PLT and, f=
or
example, allows a override from a different library.

The following code generates a direct call beween g2 and f2 without going
through PLT.

```
__attribute__((target_clones("default,avx2"))) int f2(int *p)
{
    asm volatile ("" :: "r"(p) : "memory");
    return *p;
}

__attribute__((target_clones("default,avx2"))) int g2(int *p)
{
    return f2(p);
}
```

but removing the target_clones attribute uses the PLT.=