From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A2FBF3858D34; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:12:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A2FBF3858D34
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592813532;
 bh=RU7stECs7GdNIdBW9c++nxck3cTlGnYE5bxpQvOGwzE=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=tFDJImNXADVrq90DQxyto3Wgq2qgTL6bjPMMph/Owd9x8Jtmt9p55pJFgjEQxAfmw
 wHldsWXKPkzRqT2O/uQmc5UAa+9UVKgHR+Gad9i2NU2X+MvO/nwIJGyleCR2bqdGZN
 mMglPK7dqGHViM7W5Oj9e67LQSKGJUVmmxp5D6mg=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/95790] Incorrect static target dispatch
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:12:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-95790-4-AQqgNrBSKY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95790-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95790-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:12:12 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95790

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think "nested" MV should just work, we just have to be careful when
optimizing
dispatch between them.  Well, if I understand correctly what nested MV shou=
ld
be
(calling a MV function from a MVed function with a different target).=