From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 800B1386F82A; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:44:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 800B1386F82A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1592822667; bh=rPHlJOOdKx7EOP4mvcO22t5CZAqBSdK12HMRFjPlOrA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dOFpOrjmeURa6hy70UUTiS3THbA7KcH5Ae08emNuDRs3+OjmwBuqokybzuP6TSanm 2fNDhyBLhe6Ytzi96gU+mbnjLKz6VwTYfZyj6gzNSlPtI/lo953cKKF/T92OYTLzSC 7Qqd/WijT6KQwzWdLr9kmr77Yn+GoqpiN36KXu9M= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95798] [10/11 Regression] Initialization code --- suboptimal Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:44:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:44:27 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95798 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps the change should be guarded on single_use?=