public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/95799] New: Assumed conjunctions are not broken down into clauses if their pureness is checked first
@ 2020-06-21 9:26 felix.von.s at posteo dot de
2020-06-22 7:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/95799] " felix.von.s at posteo dot de
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: felix.von.s at posteo dot de @ 2020-06-21 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95799
Bug ID: 95799
Summary: Assumed conjunctions are not broken down into clauses
if their pureness is checked first
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: felix.von.s at posteo dot de
Target Milestone: ---
In the attached sample, foo is compiled into returning a constant 1, while bar
will compare a to 0, even though bar’s assumption implies foo’s.
If I replace __builtin_pure_p() testing with a constant 1, both functions
compile to the same assembly code, returning a constant 1. If I change bar to
return (a >= 0 && b >= 0), it also compiles to returning a constant 1.
It seems as if the optimiser becomes unaware that conjunction elimination is a
valid rule of inference if the conjunction’s pureness is checked first.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-22 7:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-21 9:26 [Bug tree-optimization/95799] New: Assumed conjunctions are not broken down into clauses if their pureness is checked first felix.von.s at posteo dot de
2020-06-22 7:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/95799] " felix.von.s at posteo dot de
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).