From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 91136383F84E; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:59:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 91136383F84E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1592834361; bh=a674eJb7+UpCXFnIfNOGsOFzZaCHTaZz6iZ/OR2HWxA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Djwxag5s9I+N+IkOyKEavAhLSGepO8AEDnUoBtzR0F0wu63ToHlbJYXs3BM+khjf8 rLkTWSZlf4Z7UXCVb9ljPfxn5sr3ToClDI+5jjn+F1Rk3XKIk8sRmnUVnyZqlhPunf AE1SAR8ASOrPVqZpxTAtwABFVU/bO3ohkXmh9wxo= From: "haoxintu at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/95807] GCC accepts "void value not ignored as it ought to be" in function template Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:59:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: haoxintu at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:59:21 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95807 --- Comment #6 from Haoxin Tu --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > What practical impact does this have on any real world code? > Why should we spend time on that, rather than the million other things we > have to fix? Hi, Jonathan, This is the question I am always thinking about. GCC is a big software some= how, and that's impossible to treat every part equally when it has issues.=20 > Obviously in an ideal world GCC would be perfect, but the majority of your > bug reports are asking for time to be spent on things that just don't mat= ter. My team nowadays are focusing on improving the quality of mature compilers.= We just developed a tool to test them and then found those bugs. Our method mi= ght not perfect now and it only found some issues in FE, and we are designing a more effective approach to focus on the ME or BE parts (those parts might m= ore important for GCC), it still needs some time for us. So I totally agree with that you said, and maybe later reports will be more useful for you. > If you really want it fixed, you can always do it yourself: > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html This is a really constructive suggestion for me. I will try to do this at s= ome time. Anyway, thanks for your kind and helpful response!=