From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6EA3B3858D34; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:44:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6EA3B3858D34 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593092683; bh=d8YtUqriJu4RarNbKMVD3GLT1+sfY43Xi+EtMNbvPe0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Q+dhqJcwF7wJh9Uiz5MzVi2lGMqDolXLXN/1/mAl11qRCG7hl2fFxBnQ4PGpTgKo/ L8DUNF+p1Hz2HmSsY1ofRubEUPoWZD4hv5FajVXjip6RdDCbDKvCF1kru3ZNjORVFg jJPGtRvBjo+ivqaIiUEoOwNX8XXEaYXxT2kMsNds= From: "nathan at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/95809] GCC treats inline namespace declaration as "ambiguous" Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:44:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:44:43 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95809 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- yup, dr2061 made that ill-formed.=20=20 p1701 (wg21.link/p1701) documents the behaviour and it appears EWG is explo= ring another avenue to resolve the underlying problem 2061 was attempting to fix= .=