public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "victor.burckel at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95822] New: [coroutines] compiler internal error with local object with noexcept false destructor
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:51:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95822-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95822

            Bug ID: 95822
           Summary: [coroutines] compiler internal error with local object
                    with noexcept false destructor
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: victor.burckel at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

It seems that when a coroutine contains a local object whose destructor is
marked as noexcept(false), gcc reaches an unexpected state and aborts.
When compiling the following code with gcc10.1.0 (-std=c++20 -fcoroutines), I
get a compiler internal error: 
> internal compiler error: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2830

Making the destructor noexcept fixes the error. I  got the error when using
boost log within a couroutine. It uses a record_pump whose destructor is not
noexcept.

I managed to reproduce with godbolt (both gcc10.1 and gcc trunk give me the
assertion)
https://godbolt.org/z/6JtKsU

#include <coroutine>

struct task {
  struct promise_type {
    auto initial_suspend() noexcept { return std::suspend_always{}; }
    auto final_suspend() noexcept { return std::suspend_always{}; }
    void return_void() {}
    task get_return_object() { return task{}; }
    void unhandled_exception() noexcept {}
  };

  ~task() noexcept {}

  bool await_ready() const noexcept { return false; }
  void await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<>) noexcept {}
  void await_resume() noexcept {}
};

struct Error {
  ~Error() noexcept(false) {}
};

task g();
task f() {
  Error error;
  co_await g();
}

             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-22 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-22 18:51 victor.burckel at gmail dot com [this message]
2020-06-23  9:06 ` [Bug c++/95822] " iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23  6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-16  9:12 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-25 19:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 22:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 12:42 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-18 23:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95822-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).