From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EB0803954C16; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:29:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EB0803954C16 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1592904542; bh=VmfA4Jy2keBKwL7JJpJOxkkmZE69q/ImUG1X+FxiNzE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o2n+eNHWG8hLrc8uHNyqWSsRMaH9LXyWu6hv+d55MKtSYjeD71Vg0kr1Z5eseg74Z xENNUkExez20bYc9d1MkkPByfnbf1G0lhiszsbueROkfi8MeN671pwkEkBGyeutbMB 4TKcKdxeEO9rUYgcnCV6Szc2ItN6jaeP5kg2leNo= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/95832] std::vector specialization leading std::variant ctor treating it as int rather than bool Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:29:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:29:03 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95832 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on master. Not possible to backport to gcc-10, because the front end support isn't there. That unfortunately means std::variant construction works differently in each of gcc-9, gcc-10 and master.=