From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5C47639540ED; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:39:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5C47639540ED
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592897964;
 bh=GbCwV8kivMXC7KI2o3DLQmqtOBsM71k9cmpwOaV3RqQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=u8kpieibEFltNPgqEJDqwZvA2zq0N8PFOigSaAvilzP+tHewHrbkcvefylzvZAaUZ
 ox1OzDjbIH0twfLjASJTEVpRQBWk7M2WDMexG5n91dMJopn1OnybzFXz2iAyfhhYf4
 TBDpXy3YvHHDzQFmwxPaEkTjbqeeu9NI/3c9Vhsc=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/95832] std::vector<bool> specialization leading
 std::variant ctor treating it as int rather than bool
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:39:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed
 target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-95832-4-VFihi1NAis@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95832-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95832-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:39:24 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95832

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-06-23
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.0

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to fiesh from comment #0)
> The following code returned 1 when compiled with gcc-9 but returns 0 with
> gcc-10.

That's because gcc-10 implements http://wg21.link/p0608r3

GCC 10 doesn't implement http://wg21.link/p1957r2 so we still need the
additional constraint in variant's constructors that P0608R3 added: "and if=
 Ti
is cv bool, remove_cvref_t<T> is bool."=