public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/95858] New: [11 Regression] gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb
@ 2020-06-24  7:18 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-24  7:31 ` [Bug fortran/95858] " clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-24  7:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-24  7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95858

            Bug ID: 95858
           Summary: [11 Regression]
                    gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_
                    5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Since the revision the test-case fails:

$ gfortran
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90
&& ./a.out 
STOP 3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95858] [11 Regression] gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb
  2020-06-24  7:18 [Bug fortran/95858] New: [11 Regression] gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-24  7:31 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-24  7:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-24  7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95858

Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clyon at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seen on arm and aarch64 too.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95858] [11 Regression] gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb
  2020-06-24  7:18 [Bug fortran/95858] New: [11 Regression] gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-24  7:31 ` [Bug fortran/95858] " clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-24  7:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-24  7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95858

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This has been fixed in the testsuite with g:6f609029c7078fbd29e2f842074e2b9

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-24  7:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-24  7:18 [Bug fortran/95858] New: [11 Regression] gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-24  7:31 ` [Bug fortran/95858] " clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-24  7:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).