public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/95864] New: [11 Regression] GCN offloading execution regressions after commit f062c3f11505b70c5275e5bc0e52f3e441f8afbc "amdgcn: Switch to HSACO v3 binary format"
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:39:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95864-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95864

            Bug ID: 95864
           Summary: [11 Regression] GCN offloading execution regressions
                    after commit f062c3f11505b70c5275e5bc0e52f3e441f8afbc
                    "amdgcn: Switch to HSACO v3 binary format"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: openmp
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: ams at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: jules at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
            Target: gcn

I'm seeing the following GCN offloading execution regressions after commit
f062c3f11505b70c5275e5bc0e52f3e441f8afbc "amdgcn: Switch to HSACO v3 binary
format":

    PASS: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c (test for excess errors)
    [-PASS:-]{+WARNING: program timed out.+}
    {+FAIL:+} libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c execution test

    libgomp: GCN fatal error: Asynchronous queue error
    Runtime message: HSA_STATUS_ERROR_INVALID_ISA: The instruction set
architecture is invalid.

    WARNING: program timed out.
    FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c execution test

Same for C++.

    PASS: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-6.c (test for excess errors)
    [-PASS:-]{+WARNING: program timed out.+}
    {+FAIL:+} libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-6.c execution test

Same as above, same for C++.

    @@ -3456,9 +3460,11 @@ PASS: libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -O1 
execution test
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -O2  (test for excess errors)
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -O2  execution test
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  (test for excess
errors)
    [-PASS:-]{+WARNING: program timed out.+}
    {+FAIL:+} libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
    [-PASS:-]{+WARNING: program timed out.+}
    {+FAIL:+} libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -Os  (test for excess errors)
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/optional-map.f90   -Os  execution test

Same as above.

    @@ -4323,9 +4329,11 @@ PASS: libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -O1  execution
test
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -O2  (test for excess errors)
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -O2  execution test
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  (test for excess errors)
    [-PASS:-]{+WARNING: program timed out.+}
    {+FAIL:+} libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
    [-PASS:-]{+WARNING: program timed out.+}
    {+FAIL:+} libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -Os  (test for excess errors)
    PASS: libgomp.fortran/target1.f90   -Os  execution test

Same as above.


That's testing the default multilib on "Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
Fiji [Radeon R9 FURY / NANO Series] (rev ca)" hardware.  (I haven't tested
anything else.)

There seems to be some bug?


But also:


The error reporting seems "strange"?


We shouldn't run into a timeout?  (Missing unlocking on error path?)

             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-24 11:39 tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-06-24 13:16 ` [Bug target/95864] " ams at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-24 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-06 10:23 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95864-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).