From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BA7523860017; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:53:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA7523860017 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593111181; bh=9K8b/uPnPUwIRfF6AWLEL27hBJc+6GaRGZwQCGwNAZM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Z7KVJ94qfVe2IhpvyFo3CYVnj8Zqm3BzO+11N/iDW2zsCZwWTjRass+yRsyol5OYd 3LqEHtArnNHOu7ZhR98liwXif7xBTPvSKTOXLZacYgem4UwqiK2U+AU38ODHDrCV8y iiEKIlv2r5ECQoSnu8qdARGlujqStM89reQyQWjY= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95877] [8/9 regression] ICE in test case gfortran.dg/pr95689.f90 after r9-8693 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:53:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:53:01 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95877 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The backport was reverted on 8- and 9-branch, since not a critical regressi= on, and a clean backport would need a manual backport of a series of other fixe= s. The error should be gone now. If you have confirmed this, please close this PR.=