From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 98E603987961; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:10:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 98E603987961 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593033050; bh=N2OTafGxQvljvNOXOzdP4uGbkNC/fPKpphZb8de7yRY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YreA2Z7SbtWF5QFOa1B7QReyjCl7ClG227iivpOOX/WRFRok2d9XQGrJSwzCmJE7E E0WAM/axPUtDxSE9pHXQ9qkgXUWX+v+VM+bYgfSZ47Hla2/KM1g4kTRslk+ySMunoF eAJALvs/XkOg40/K2lPOy0gLHiGJGk2aTyy95FFE= From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95880] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_type, at fortran/symbol.c:2030 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:10:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on priority everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:10:50 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95880 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2020-06-24 Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This is due to a change in GCC11 that have been back ported to GCC9 and 10 (pr94397?).=