From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9435B3851C17; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:19:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9435B3851C17 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593051548; bh=40WB4pNXtbgN/Kkq/UR3dgdtRg4ASQwU7iFsPQVzUfU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ucGLg3+MBDcn6+r+7rTpMY9Vt+mHm7g1+4hLFrvQTlzxOQw6zmvY7fkwf+2MdnHyM vRay+LP8F8BXRcGXVYJcx1E1kt8uT26h1rIQ8W6DI29U2N6YfOnnjRvz55CO8y9oyU lLejXiCfrDLGinpyguXKMbV3ktKBBjtW0k5uXSRw= From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95880] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_type, at fortran/symbol.c:2030 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:19:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:19:08 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95880 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > This is due to a change in GCC11 that have been back ported to GCC9 and 10 > (pr94397?). It is NOT pr94397.=