From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 573B23851C11; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:38:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 573B23851C11 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593070701; bh=SRYx/WI/rEJTy9+EAIOfIOCXy7ZsvYUVuw8l7onkWL4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HOKXjM+WSx/EAhVjiPAaV7DNCqhrDGnt6TvQ8UhWUJLGqROupNYA65+QBzv1vjYwN A2mdsWV1RWKyGKJe10Z4afV5ZgZfDfb2p/Fcm/JlKFYjMdFlUCIaNh/bE9KA0MBKrP /ACOCTyTD8POyVgzqvKpjf+EjSYJK/ZJ27s3pegQ= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95885] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT macro documentation is incorrect. Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:38:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:38:21 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95885 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The documentation is correct, the x86 implementation is not. Note the documentation says "One use of this macro...", so clearly it's documentation can be improved by explicitely constraining the macro to increase alignment= .=