From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 76F7D3858CDA; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:32:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 76F7D3858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668191568; bh=NzMXQOVbbo7aEJXNS4xo3FcVPh3yH49J/oAGQM7npto=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BHGitx6xxvh4d81WHE5I32E+XenFMXd4Ah/aavsvERn0pOo2fHMxciBZfTP+yVOGe yA6EGNulzOe6e35nAb6rrRnmjOClBaFt6q1Et+dprIXSTOrWA1Bjx4pxHJj2rbvrdE FDGC6b4P2+kCs+77JZKsGY1N/DvVMNtlfQCAz6yI= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95885] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT and TARGET_LOWER_LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT macro documentation should be improved Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:32:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to short_desc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95885 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot = gnu.org Summary|LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT macro |LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT and |documentation is incorrect. |TARGET_LOWER_LOCAL_DECL_ALI | |GNMENT macro documentation | |should be improved Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- There is now TARGET_LOWER_LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT which was added by r11-2259-g 0a9d711df36b42 . We should provide examples of when one should be used vs the other. And maybe even better describe why there are two target hooks that seems li= ke does the same thing now. I am going to try to this for GCC 14 with the other target macro/hooks clea= nups I am doing.=