From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5AEB8386F002; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:25:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5AEB8386F002
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1593127540;
 bh=Zm+CsgbDkOeQqBHPWscqyN+6kJ0Nd9jUc2zdJOe7uqw=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=kT9OxihIrL9ncwa4h/EPmXsUZ/rtDXmFGc1YSIOyGtTkl3V07Ax1clpndWiBRxp0A
 t5lGQSRqgF/JqNLWApqJoKZEDD83ZEc2t/dkXCb8UtVC2TkPlLoKEBH84vIq5U75gJ
 u13ZChbwlCADMZKtn8PS2NSBvOamaFFL1bjjxIv8=
From: "markus at oberhumer dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/95903] New: gcc 10: wrong code with -fwrapv
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:25:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: markus at oberhumer dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-95903-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:25:40 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95903

            Bug ID: 95903
           Summary: gcc 10: wrong code with -fwrapv
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: markus at oberhumer dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Link at Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/VgNLcX


The following 2 functions should generate identical code when using "-fwrap=
v",
but
the second function is missing the sign extension after the add.


// compile with: gcc-10 -m64 -O2 -fwrapv

char get_byte_use_add(const char* ptr, int off)
{
    off +=3D 1;
    return ptr[off];
}

char get_byte_use_plus(const char* ptr, int off)
{
    return ptr[off + 1]; // gcc: BUG
}=