From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A0E47385DC00; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 02:08:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A0E47385DC00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593223690; bh=bwypxberE2K+w+6EX59wlyAKwBZ5O2vux1uYcdr9nEE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=lG9Ji+0osQ6dy/Dfn6AVEoDkmY6y9Q+XcmillPYTaN9NMz0cSPJ+mW4fY7TCsJtPR LQKYzJBhuXG5m9+OiIJgdJPmGnaDih+0WLOeW0Ofihc33kd3s2SPyRRXnM1hXeStXg CWnKbxwSTAxYfXJYY3Pr01fcLYVRNlY1j8P8MCLQ= From: "gabravier at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/95926] New: Failure to optimize xor pattern when Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 02:08:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gabravier at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 02:08:10 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95926 Bug ID: 95926 Summary: Failure to optimize xor pattern when Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gabravier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- bool f(bool a, bool b) { bool tmp =3D a & b; return (tmp ^ b) | (tmp ^ a); } This code does not optimize as well as this code : bool f(bool a, bool b) { return ((a & b) ^ b) | ((a & b) ^ a); } which optimizes to `return a ^ b;`. This seems rather odd considering that = they are equivalent and the first example is just a simplification of the second (i.e. made more readable).=