From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9B12A3851C09; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:38:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9B12A3851C09 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593376730; bh=r23dX7wlYDJ/eM/BdNx+Gi1Q3xxNriohJ2fe81IfTDQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vdB3vRTuni+uU2dY2tIFzm+4sq3l60FRUn+uhIUC2QLKnuXXF7w1regpQKKq6WzHU b4ioBIkGc3pNNI1lqh3krPtPJUSFR0pc0N8XIcLzRthvnEhOkqQVsz1SKQQbXdCYAB vIXiqNqgfhzhFZPi/O8LJsibYDbf0d9hbJrgDcoA= From: "kutdanila at yandex dot ru" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/95950] Call to pseudo-destructor does not end the lifetime until C++20 Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:38:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kutdanila at yandex dot ru X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:38:50 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95950 Danila Kutenin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Danila Kutenin --- I reread the standard, call to destructor for class types ends the lifetime= , so this behaviour is valid=