From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E9F3A386EC42; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:33:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E9F3A386EC42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593448394; bh=K5BXfpWzWcpFKugZ8+j1W0D8F1dTZ1Ee3kAUN5Xcr0o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OMuMz14hHxjqn0Z7hPBTncZUm7JxBeiYZ4Fa8Bhs/C5ObJBlJnpj+s9w5HEW4oGQB dpFy7ci7rWiw3elFlgRk/X6a+nDGqP3oYOjBg6cCpLD+dpwem7BkLZHbCKKLw0hN4M RUz1y2s81GIjv4OGgY4OZoinaxY8b25rbHWLZPL0= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95952] [8 Regression] gcc-8 bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:33:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:33:15 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95952 Peter Bergner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #3) > Couldn't duplicate on P8/BE. I still have a couple builds going to see i= f I > can duplicate elsewhere. >=20 > I see "--with-cpu=3Ddefault32 " in the config string. Is this an older > hardware platform?=20=20 --with-cpu=3Ddefault32 is valid on any BE system, old or new. It just crea= tes a compiler that defaults to -m32 rather than -m64. Ie, the compile above tha= t is ICEing has an implicit -m32 added. I can help you build a default32 gcc if just adding -m32 to your compile doesn't ICE on the test case.=