From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8726A385E830; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:28:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8726A385E830 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593646098; bh=MH71Uo7BZf0RTtmpAY9EEaM3xHxDtj83Oh2KBkB7Kek=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=a31roEFn0HlnxPXErhTamH07oSZ87oJcDBoIGQKvOpxR0oNu9u99BZY0IPmsRJg3I uuLSO6YySrYzekqyHJO7sxdIpJpPeW3MpPvHCm9amdTaKHI6R+Xqu2YN2/N1Jb4hiw cv4bU/j5F+T2R4sfumLEK87XcuhuxQ8mHcLDT758= From: "mikpelinux at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95952] [8 Regression] gcc-8 bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 23:28:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mikpelinux at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 23:28:18 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95952 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #7) > I've tried many 32-bit builds, but cannot reproduce the error. I tried w= ith > top of the releases/gcc-8 branch, using releases/gcc-8 branch at commit > 09f2293fac1785681f8ceaf6ae6d2d5cfe519b08 and varying configure options.=20 > That said, I am using a trunk binutils build from today, because I needed= a > 32-bit binutils. What version of binutils are you using? binutils-2.23.88.0.1-13.fc20.ppc64 I can build a recent binutils release and retry the gcc-8 bootstrap with th= at tomorrow. But since gcc-9/10/11 all bootstrap Ok, I find it difficult to suspect it's a binutils issue.=