public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/95962] Inefficient code for simple arm_neon.h iota operation
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:01:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95962-4-oIc7so0gdR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95962-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95962

Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-08-12
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We generate the correct code at -O3 but not -O2.

At -O3 we generate

foo:
        adrp    x0, .LC0
        sub     sp, sp, #16
        ldr     q0, [x0, #:lo12:.LC0]
        add     sp, sp, 16
        ret

where the problem seems to be at at -O2 store merging has broken up the
construction of `array` into two separate memory accesses:

  MEM <unsigned long> [(int *)&array] = 4294967296;
  MEM <unsigned long> [(int *)&array + 8B] = 12884901890;

whereas at -O3 we still have a single assignment:

  MEM <vector(4) int> [(int *)&array] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };

I'm not sure even if we made these loads gimple level if that would help. we'd
still have the explicit MEMs created by store merging.

Perhaps we should just make store-merging allow TImode merges and split them in
the backend if needed.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-12  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-29 12:49 [Bug target/95962] New: " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-12  8:01 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-08-20 11:52 ` [Bug target/95962] " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-15 15:09 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-03 17:05 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95962-4-oIc7so0gdR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).