From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4EAED3851C03; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:38:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4EAED3851C03 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593452330; bh=7HInaj+89ip5XL+OaibrxREEF4khBae7lUwoMhS7qkc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=azxKckHp50K/yVFCSplDYHXPO1lAC0VW+u28BGBrEF3T3D/7RTH2RgJZQVIRDDpcz nemTJSL3ecm/edrWNQ3xeftt+uG+7+JRoCnLnzKXALhenMiPbMxhXfHVboHCDJ1ZrX ZxjyPo/DUmP1A60BlkCCZl6uUDZPeUdQ83z0EAC8= From: "ian at airs dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBib290c3RyYXAvOTU5NzBdIGdjYy9nby9nb2Zyb250ZW5k?= =?UTF-8?B?L3R5cGVzLmNjOjE0NzQ6MzQ6IHdhcm5pbmc6IOKAmHRoaXPigJkgcG9pbnRl?= =?UTF-8?B?ciBudWxs?= Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:38:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at airs dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:38:50 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95970 --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I'm having a hard time parsing the warning. It says gcc/go/gofrontend/types.cc:1474:34: warning: =E2=80=98this=E2=80=99 pointer= null [-Wnonnull] The line is return type->do_type_descriptor(gogo, NULL); Is this trying to say that "type" may be NULL? That's true, it can be. This does look like a bug. There must be some rea= son that this code is never executed.=