From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4C4433851C2A; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:33:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4C4433851C2A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1593451985;
 bh=JK2yDGkepFKvtJYc1WQjHDzXmiEq6xOInCkNJj73gqQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=jONDF6pt/X0PmhiWUosnZk3fG+hqK3Xfarz1swZe4ZTmdo7AUbdKe2GfMkkayqjhl
 uzPVP7a/e6Z9u/cseGAZ9T85TFx2uC39rkiD2sLEsvzuL90+2U4DtakQqKMoSlPugz
 UFQzHtrjp7fCC4smUG2g3xktYb+TJxEiQSmNntk8=
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBib290c3RyYXAvOTU5NzBdIGdjYy9nby9nb2Zyb250ZW5k?=
 =?UTF-8?B?L3R5cGVzLmNjOjE0NzQ6MzQ6IHdhcm5pbmc6IOKAmHRoaXPigJkgcG9pbnRl?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ciBudWxs?=
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:33:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95970-4-hwipYxeAwh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:33:05 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95970

--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On second thought, I think the warning might be correct.  The function it's
issued for is a static member of class Type (I at first thought it was
virtual):

Expression*
Type::type_descriptor(Gogo* gogo, Type* type)
{
  return type->do_type_descriptor(gogo, NULL);   <<< -Wnonnull
}

and the call to it is below:

Expression*
Named_type::do_type_descriptor(Gogo* gogo, Named_type* name)
{
  if (this->is_error_)
    return Expression::make_error(this->location_);
  if (name =3D=3D NULL && this->is_alias_)
    {
      if (this->seen_alias_)
        return Expression::make_error(this->location_);
      this->seen_alias_ =3D true;
      Expression* ret =3D this->type_->type_descriptor(gogo, NULL);   <<<
      this->seen_alias_ =3D false;
      return ret;
    }

I'll leave it to Ian to confirm one way or the other.=