From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 9AA363840C35; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:36:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9AA363840C35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1594384612;
 bh=SniNVqWx268E3MnmOvcYvBv/AVEy1nEFWR9KOeaHDAE=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=m9XkgX4TxiN9K58yqDLWDTzE6PhN0NfzONH0GEtFvOEpPEYIIKI3YIA18+sErqI6t
 1PoMmXzqQx2G4NpJddCj+PTFpbXbeKdCu1HeMsRZ6c8ZM1wTb5YYW7/+cpSaIFQXp9
 NM/Q9quaVrTnvwzOYjQiFBxy2RI9U6m9BV3WWMFQ=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95976] [[no_unique_address]] on union members has the
 opposite-of-intended effect
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:36:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95976-4-oCSFTdjplx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95976-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95976-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:36:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95976

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e47dfca5aa473e77fdff95d631dc39de87a41eec

commit r11-2014-ge47dfca5aa473e77fdff95d631dc39de87a41eec
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 9 15:11:12 2020 -0400

    c++: [[no_unique_address]] fixes. [PR96105]

    We were wrongly checking is_empty_class on the result of strip_array_ty=
pes
    rather than the actual field type.  We weren't considering the alignmen=
t of
    the data member.  We needed to handle unions the same way as
    layout_nonempty_base_or_field.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/96105
            PR c++/96052
            PR c++/95976
            * class.c (check_field_decls): An array of empty classes is not=
 an
            empty data member.
            (layout_empty_base_or_field): Handle explicit alignment.
            Fix union handling.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/96105
            PR c++/96052
            PR c++/95976
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address4.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address5.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address6.C: New test.=