From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EEBCE386F037; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:47:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EEBCE386F037 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593463629; bh=fxOMd1LNkqkHA0lpJ0BiyjKls+VWiIm4oXqYuiEdV6s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=giSt0SZbbvz320JQloFdslS+ONWDa90cPhktPc3QKpTa7y3ZNCp10UUqUFaoMEyaR vu/QJf19xMfrZlNTs2yLe/drFa84YAXWRL+GeFNaxCcxEvRHXxMXduoJ74RR1kPhSH NJMoTPaNGUvHje1LRxBJswhOwGWWF1MhCjINIl1g= From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95978] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_data, at fortran/decl.c:731 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:47:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status target_milestone cf_known_to_fail priority cf_known_to_work everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:47:10 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95978 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2020-06-29 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Known to fail| |10.1.0, 11.0 Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work| |9.3.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- My build at 2019-12-18 doesn't give an ICE, gcc11-706 does. Probably a chan= ge on master, back ported to GCC10.=