From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DE3F63898529; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:11:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE3F63898529 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593465102; bh=poVvboE4i0ywtVYkmIzO/SJ0L7sRMZjPHNis84qGriQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PqCrupVP0QMg331Zsil3URG6RFsCw4QSpjAOMqMkNMvGk4eANNdaUzgHzC4WR40LA j/m6IO9MAPFW4oZBGvNIa94FSj8AiSH9qhGtloYD8jf7UYqSBXY2Ym9ZzS5RcbhFne yMbkBir1lmqdssiJxYyxbhn4xyCpL708xeyIjUgA= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95978] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_data, at fortran/decl.c:731 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:11:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:11:43 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95978 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The obvious patch diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.c b/gcc/fortran/decl.c index ac1f63f66e0..f38def4c291 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/decl.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.c @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ gfc_match_data (void) gfc_constructor *c; c =3D gfc_constructor_first (new_data->value->expr->value.constru= ctor); for (; c; c =3D gfc_constructor_next (c)) - if (c->expr->ts.type =3D=3D BT_BOZ) + if (c->expr && c->expr->ts.type =3D=3D BT_BOZ) { gfc_error ("BOZ literal constant at %L cannot appear in a " "structure constructor", &c->expr->where); leads to: z1.f90:5:19: 5 | data c /t(1)/ | 1 Error: Unexpected DATA statement at (1)=