From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7167D3857825; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:44:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7167D3857825 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1598388260; bh=Poy1Z/xJFlN5OA1gd9v1ehtuBY+CfsN1Yn8i0UxjVf4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HIHserk/kecZxBeH7/LdBiEMUvLS1XeucV7qZv38QtAgDJhpv5ldnz0P/IALv2QRl m4viLMSqTtMlbVWC4mDB4/tq2tS0OnTgLLDdfNbx9TliWg7MdCHD29wr3weWzCn4aU JqtiSr9CD27cuieMkU2ZWRuzD+O6zJm+pIfbN10Y= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95979] [10/11 Regression] ICE in get_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:129 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:44:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:44:20 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95979 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Only examples z1 and z2 are invalid code, z3 is actually valid code. Adjusting keywords. Maybe the issue is related to PR87711, where the optional KIND argument causes havoc with the elementalness of an intrinsic. (There it is LEN_TRIM)= .=