public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/95989] Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:26:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95989-4-AMklb61EXF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989

--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> > --- a/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
> > +++ b/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
> > @@ -684,7 +684,12 @@ __gthread_equal (__gthread_t __t1, __gthread_t __t2)
> >  static inline __gthread_t
> >  __gthread_self (void)
> >  {
> > +#if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 27)
> 
> Hmm, maybe we should just check #ifdef __GLIBC__ here, since it's available
> in libc even before glibc 2.27 (it returns 0 rather than a real tid before
> 2.27, but that's OK).

Except that as Florian said above, it's missing from libc.a prior to 2.27 so if
we used it unconditionally, you wouldn't be able to link statically.

> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/thread
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/thread
> > @@ -364,13 +364,14 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> >      inline thread::id
> >      get_id() noexcept
> >      {
> > -#ifdef __GLIBC__
> > +#if defined __GLIBC__ && ! __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 27)
> 
> And maybe we shouldn't change this check either.
> 
> If we make it depend on the glibc version then because this function is
> inline a program could have two different definitions inlined if different
> objects were compiled by different versions of gcc, or against different
> versions of glibc. One object could inline the version returning
> thread::id(1) and another could inline the version returning
> thread::id(__gthread_self()). This could result in two different IDs for the
> main thread of a single-threaded program. So maybe we should just stick to
> returning thread::id(1) for all glibc versions.

I've decided I'm not too concerned about this. There are probably not many
users of std::this_thread::get_id() in programs not linked with -lpthread, and
any such code will have to deal with a change here once all pthreads symbols
move into glibc's libc anyway. When that happens __gthread_active_p will always
be true. Let's just go ahead and use pthread_self() when it's known to work
(i.e. glibc 2.27 and later).

Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/558737.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-11 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-30 20:25 [Bug libstdc++/95989] New: " webrown.cpp at gmail dot com
2020-06-30 22:35 ` [Bug libstdc++/95989] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 22:59 ` antal.buss at ualberta dot ca
2020-06-30 23:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 23:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 23:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 10:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 13:28 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 13:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-06 12:38 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-08 14:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-08 15:36 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-09  9:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-11 17:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-11-19 21:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-20 13:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-20 13:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-21 13:42 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04  4:08 ` lightningdzeyenr at gmail dot com
2022-03-04  9:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-09  4:27 ` lightningdzeyenr at gmail dot com
2023-03-03 19:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 12:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95989-4-AMklb61EXF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).