public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/95989] Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 21:07:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95989-4-mEKOJCsyC9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989

--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08b4d325711d5c6f68ac29443aba3fd7aa173ac8

commit r11-5183-g08b4d325711d5c6f68ac29443aba3fd7aa173ac8
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Nov 19 21:07:06 2020 +0000

    libstdc++: Avoid calling undefined __gthread_self weak symbol [PR 95989]

    Since glibc 2.27 the pthread_self symbol has been defined in libc rather
    than libpthread. Because we only call pthread_self through a weak alias
    it's possible for statically linked executables to end up without a
    definition of pthread_self. This crashes when trying to call an
    undefined weak symbol.

    We can use the __GLIBC_PREREQ version check to detect the version of
    glibc where pthread_self is no longer in libpthread, and call it
    directly rather than through the weak reference.

    It would be better to check for pthread_self in libc during configure
    instead of hardcoding the __GLIBC_PREREQ check. That would be
    complicated by the fact that prior to glibc 2.27 libc.a didn't have the
    pthread_self symbol, but libc.so.6 did.  The configure checks would need
    to try to link both statically and dynamically, and the result would
    depend on whether the static libc.a happens to be installed during
    configure (which could vary between different systems using the same
    version of glibc). Doing it properly is left for a future date, as that
    will be needed anyway after glibc moves all pthread symbols from
    libpthread to libc. When that happens we should revisit the whole
    approach of using weak symbols for pthread symbols.

    For the purposes of std::this_thread::get_id() we call
    pthread_self() directly when using glibc 2.27 or later. Otherwise, if
    __gthread_active_p() is true then we know the libpthread symbol is
    available so we call that. Otherwise, we are single-threaded and just
    use ((__gthread_t)1) as the thread ID.

    An undesirable consequence of this change is that code compiled prior to
    the change might inline the old definition of this_thread::get_id()
    which always returns (__gthread_t)1 in a program that isn't linked to
    libpthread. Code compiled after the change will use pthread_self() and
    so get a real TID. That could result in the main thread having different
    thread::id values in different translation units. This seems acceptable,
    as there are not expected to be many uses of thread::id in programs
    that aren't linked to libpthread.

    An earlier version of this patch also changed __gthread_self() to use
    __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 27) and only use the weak symbol for older glibc. Tha
    might still make sense to do, but isn't needed by libstdc++ now.

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/95989
            * config/os/gnu-linux/os_defines.h (_GLIBCXX_NATIVE_THREAD_ID):
            Define new macro to get reliable thread ID.
            * include/bits/std_thread.h: (this_thread::get_id): Use new
            macro if it's defined.
            * testsuite/30_threads/jthread/95989.cc: New test.
            * testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/95989.cc: New test.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-19 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-30 20:25 [Bug libstdc++/95989] New: " webrown.cpp at gmail dot com
2020-06-30 22:35 ` [Bug libstdc++/95989] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 22:59 ` antal.buss at ualberta dot ca
2020-06-30 23:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 23:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-30 23:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 10:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 13:28 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 13:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-06 12:38 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-08 14:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-08 15:36 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-09  9:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-11 17:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-19 21:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-11-20 13:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-20 13:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-21 13:42 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04  4:08 ` lightningdzeyenr at gmail dot com
2022-03-04  9:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-09  4:27 ` lightningdzeyenr at gmail dot com
2023-03-03 19:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 12:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95989-4-mEKOJCsyC9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).