public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/95998] gfc_typename use of static memory
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 08:46:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95998-4-TaBATHa6z3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95998-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95998

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> If we ever have three occurences of gfc_typename in a function list,
> like
>
>   foo (gfc_typename(a), gfc_typename(b), gfc_typename(c));
>
> we will get the wrong result for the third one.  We will also get
> a wrong result for
>
>   pa = gfc_typename(a);
>   pb = gfc_typename(b);
>   pc = gfc_typename(c);
>
> because then pa will point to the same memory as pc.

OK. I think I am now starting to understand how this proc works.

I have looked at the occurrences of gfc_typename, and AFAICT they appear only
once or twice within
the same gfc_error, except for (line 2303 in check.c)

     gfc_error ("The function passed as OPERATOR at %L has arguments of type "
                 "%s and %s but shall have type %s", &op->where,
                 gfc_typename (&formal->sym->ts),
                 gfc_typename (&formal->next->sym->ts), gfc_typename (a));

but 'a' is a gfc_expr, while 'formal->sym->ts', and 'formal->next->sym->ts' are
gfc_typespec, so different procs and it should be OK.

Note that presently gfc_typename is only called in error messages and potential
problems will
only show as strange errors.

However in noticed a potential buffer overflow with DEC extensions:

  static char buffer1[GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN + 7];  /* 7 for "TYPE()" + '\0'.  */
  static char buffer2[GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN + 7];

should be

  static char buffer1[GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN + 8];  /* 8 for "UNION()" + '\0'.  */
  static char buffer2[GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN + 8];

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-12  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-08 12:17 [Bug fortran/95998] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-11 17:47 ` [Bug fortran/95998] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-12  8:46 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr [this message]
2021-03-28 12:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95998-4-TaBATHa6z3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).